Monthly Archives: March 2010

Wednesday, 3/31/10, Public Square

Advertisements

68 Comments

Filed under The Public Square

The Hutaree: A Right Wing Threat

A paramilitary group from Michigan which called itself Hutaree planned to kill police officers whom it considers to be foot soldiers of the government.  They planned to make a fake 911 call and then kill the officers who responded to the call.  Further they planned to show up at the funerals of the officers and kill more officers who would likely attend the funerals.

Strange as it may sound this group considered themselves a Christian organization.  From the Washington Post  “The group’s Web site bears the slogan ‘preparing for the end time battles to keep the testimony of Jesus Christ alive.'”

Eugene Robinson in his editorial today notes that the very real threat of extremist groups now appears to derive soley from the right wing.  While the left had violent groups in the past, this is not currently the case.  Anyone have a theory on this development?

iggydonnelly

10 Comments

Filed under hate groups

Tuesday, 3/30/10, Public Square

30 Comments

Filed under The Public Square

Obama’s Dilemma: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed

Should Obama stick to his campaign promises and try 9/11 detainees as criminal defendents or should he use military tribunals?  Is the abandonment of the constitution a necessity in fighting the “war” on terror?  These two questions have serious consequences for the Obama administration – and the subject, unlike health care reform, may not have an obvious political upside.

“’It would be the biggest mistake we could possibly make, in my view, since 9/11,’ Graham has said about a civilian trial. ‘We would be giving constitutional rights to the mastermind of 9/11, as if he were any average, everyday criminal American citizen. We would be basically saying to the mastermind of 9/11, and to the world at large, that 9/11 was a criminal act, not an act of war.’ “(see politico.com source below)

An act of war?  How about, instead, we think of it as an act of terrorism, which hopes that we abandon our principles of constitutional government in our response?  Who wins then?  Eric Holder has said “that trying Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in a courtroom as ‘the defining event of my time as attorney general,’ and [failinng to do that] would open the president to claims that he’s forsaking his principles for the sake of political convenience.”   See more here.

This won’t be a pretty fight.  What should the president do?

iggydonnelly

33 Comments

Filed under terror

Monday, 3/29/10, Public Square

18 Comments

Filed under The Public Square

Sunday, 3/28/10, Public Square

14 Comments

Filed under The Public Square

In case you missed these cartoons

Some of my favorites of the many cartoons health-care reform spawned

1 Comment

Filed under Healthcare, Humor