Rush is Gay?

According to this web site there are rumors about Rush’s sexual orientation.  Say it isn’t so!  A man who claims to have been romantically involved with Rush, says none of Rush’s four marriages were ever consummated.

It couldn’t be true, could it?


Filed under Wingnuts!

19 responses to “Rush is Gay?

  1. David B

    Well, that could explain a lot….

  2. I can’t think about this topic. Even the two words Rush and sex don’t belong in the same sentence.

    Is he a man?

    Is he a human?

  3. PrairiePond


  4. I can’t see Rush Limbaugh as a sexual being, either, fnord.

    I think it would be an insult to the lbgt community if it was proven that he is actually homosexual.

    I have always thought he might lean towards being a pederast, though.

  5. lilacluvr

    If this turns out to be true, I wonder if the ‘real’ Republicans will be shipping him to Uganda?

  6. PrairiePond

    “I think it would be an insult to the lbgt community if it was proven that he is actually homosexual.”

    Exactly. That’s why I’m gonna repeat my comment.


    Geez, I’d rather claim Jeffrey Dahmer than ol’ oxy.

  7. PrairiePond

    I’m sure rick warren will figure out some way to support uganda and still keep rush right here where he can help fill those saddleback saddlebags with gold.

    • lilacluvr

      Of course, when one of their own gets ‘outed’, then that person will claim to have repented and turned their life over to God – kinda like that preacher from Colorado – what’s his name?

      When he was found out, the church gave him a very nice parting salary, he packed his lovely wife and all their children into their fancy SUV and drove off into the sunset.

      But I think I saw him and his lovely wife on Oprah (or some other talk show) in the past few months.

      So, like snakes often do – these types will slither back into their cushiony jobs of fleecing the gullible once more – somewhere.

  8. tosmarttobegop

    I can not remember on what show it was, but had a point.

    He went on a two week trip with four other men and had a month’s supply of Viagra?

    • To the Dominican Republic, yes, I remember this. And, at the time, someone I know was trying to tell me that this is one of the places that wealthy men go to have sex with underaged children, specifically male. I don’t know about that part of it, but maybe that’s what gave me the impression of Rush that I spoke of earlier.

      • lilacluvr

        Didn’t 60 Minutes or Dateline do a story about these wealthy American males going to these foreign countries to have sex with kids.

        The story I saw was downright disgusting – some of those kids were as young as 6 yrs old.

        Then people wonder why people in foreign countries hate America?

  9. lilacluvr

    Come to think of it……the guy does have a $400 million dollar contract and yet no woman will stay with him……???

    BTW – if this was something about Obama, how fast do you think all the dittoheads would be talking to spread the news??

  10. PrairiePond


  11. tosmarttobegop

    Given time to think about this, his sexuality should not be an issue.
    To imply he is Gay is done to demean him and Lord knows there is more that he should be demeaned for.
    But this is a oxymoron in a sense, Who here would demean anyone for being Gay?

    To use the implication is the same thing as it would for anyone else.
    We do not qualify P.P. stances or opinion with the trailer of “Hey you know she is…”.
    In a real sense it is the same as any one being against Gay marriage and it is not because of Religious beliefs its because the people wanting to get married are Gay. The talent of Homophobe reaching out and into the issue of Rush Limbaugh.

  12. PrairiePond

    well said, tstbg!

    I do think the fun in ridicule with rush is the hypocrisy. If he wasnt such a homophobe, he wouldnt get any flack about possibly being gay.

    Notice the qualifier. I’m still convinced “no true queer” could be as dumb or hateful as rush.

    wink wink!

    • tosmarttobegop

      It was on one of the Survivor series, there was a openly gay man who was a contestant.
      He said he wanted to do it to show that all Gay man were not a bunch of whinny sissies.

      But then after seeing his performance on the show even he admitted that all he was being was a whinny sissy!

      Hilton Paris did not do the cause any good, his introducing the subject of Gay marriage at the beauty pageant was Political not prudent. Then his reaction the following day damaged the cause even more.
      So yes I can see a true queer being so hateful and dumb.

      Often the most ardent anti-gay and outspoken are those who’s greatest fear is that they might be Gay themselves. Otherwise it is put in prospective and that is that there is no harm to themselves.
      Even those who take a religious stance are not truly basing it on that religion.
      The passages are directed solely to those of the faith.

  13. Yeah! Another hypocrite exposed.